Introduction [Note: The creator of this writing was an
auditor/Commander with the Air Force Audit Agency]
I don't believe
that they will ever be an on-site audit/review of the surpluses, but there is
such a possibility.
If a decision is
made to have an audit/detailed review of the government in order to identify
surpluses, then there are some items that need to be considered.
No One is
Unbiased
The government
(bureaucrats and politicians) naturally want the status quo and will do/say
anything to keep it that way. So they are biased toward the fact that there are
no surpluses. However, if you select independent taxpayers to determine what is
or is not surplus, some will want to immediately declare one half the
bureaucrats/politicians salaries as surplus and go from there. So neither side
is unbiased in this matter.
The
Government Should Not Pay or Provide the Audit Team
You should
not allow the government to conduct an on-site audit of surpluses or allow the
government to hire an outside firm to conduct the audit. If you do you will not
like the results.
In fact,
there may even be a possibility that they would be no surpluses but a
recommendation of tax increases. You may laugh at this, but remember no one
bites the hand that feeds it.
Use only qualified
auditors/accountants/financial personnel as audit/review team members
(hereafter referred to as the team.)
The conduct of the
review will go more smoothly if qualified individuals are used as team members.
Preferably team members should not have strong political ties to a particular
political party. A politically balanced membership is preferred.
Qualified retired
personnel are a good source to consider. They probably will be able to conduct
themselves professionally and may reduce the resistance of using active working
individuals who may have a career agenda to enhance. A mix would be OK. Place a
retiree as the teams manager. Pay
or Not Pay Team Members
Decisions need to
be made on whether to pay the team members or not. The amount of pay and the
duration of the teams engagement need to be considered and decided
on.
If team members
are paid by the hour and there is no deadline on completion of the review it
may take considerably longer than if there is:
-
An hourly
rate of pay and a deadline on when the review will be completed, or
-
An hourly
rate of pay and a deadline on when the review will be completed, with a
considerably lesser hourly rate if the review exceeds the
deadline.
Who is going to
pay the team members and where will the equipment/supplies and clerical staff
come from?
Team
Members Selection Criteria
What criteria
will be used to select the team members? Who will make the selections? These
need to be considered.
Team Members' Instructions
All team members
should be instructed on the purpose of the review and each should sign an
agreement that matters not relating to the identification of surpluses will not
be pursued, discussed or reported on in any way during or after the review. You
don't want glory-happy pseudo-whistle blowers destroying the objectives of the
review.
It should be
strictly enforced that the review shall be in strict confidence from the
beginning of the review to the final report and no information regarding the
results or planning in the review shall be disclosed to anyone, especially
members of the news media directly or indirectly, until after the final report
is published for public review. Remember the politicians, bureaucrats, and news
media will use a media blitz to try to discredit the review teams efforts
and they probably will leak false information for publication. The
review team should maintain its confidentiality until the bitter end.
The Team's
Authority
The review team
needs to have the authority to review all financial and other data available
pertaining to the potential existence of surpluses.
The review
teams authority should be limited to determining whether surpluses exist
and what action should be taken about the surpluses. The review team is not
conducting a management audit. The review team should have no authority and
should not concern itself with:
If any of the
above are identified, they should not be reported on, discussed with outsiders,
or pursued.
Any member of
the team that violates these standards should be dismissed from the
team.
The Review Process
The review
process is a very important aspect of insuring that both sides have an equal
opportunity to have sufficient input to the end result, although the reviewers
have a slight edge.
Initial report
The initial report
should contain the following:
- What was reviewed.
- Each finding and
corresponding recommendation listed together.
- Instructions to the
government requesting comments on each finding and recommendation.
Initial report submitted to government for
comments
A reasonable
amount of time must be provided for the government to respond to each finding
and recommendation.
Final report
The final report
is an expansion of the initial report and should contain the following items in
this order:
a. What was reviewed
b. For each finding-recommendation set
- The review teams initial
finding and recommendation
- Governments comments to
the finding and recommendation
- Comments on dissenting team
members on finding or recommendation
- The majority decision of the
review teams final finding and recommendation
c. Action to be taken on final report
- Items that need arbitration
or mediation
- Action to take and time table
on items that do not need arbitration or mediation
d. Make the detailed report (items a, b, and c above) available
to the public
Prepare a good and
proper summary of the report in layman's terms and attempt to have it published
in the news media in its entirety rather than allowing the news media to put
its own spin on the report while revealing some of its contents, and maybe not
everything. The report and news media spin should be published separately in
the news media.
You need to have a
good plan of attack on this matter because the news media will always want to
include or not include certain items depending on what they have been
instructed from Goliath to portray to the American people. Do a lot of "What
if" scenarios with contingency plans. It is very important that what the review
team found is properly reported in the news media, the main source of Goliath's
propaganda. Anticipate
Strong Opposition/Legal Action
Governments and
those that control governments will not give up their control of the people or
the peoples wealth without a fight. Anticipate legal action on any
finding and recommendation, or possibly every finding and recommendation. The
government has unlimited resources to challenge anything, because it uses your
money. Attempt to prevent the government from hiring private legal help on
their legal challenges. These costs will be huge, pork for government lawyers,
and it's your money.
Consider
establishing an arbitration or mediation approach for disagreements in the
final report. Try to use anything but the legal/court system. Goliath owns the
legal/court system. This could drag on for years and the lawyers and courts
will eat up any surpluses found and then some.
We suspect that a
judge will immediately place an injunction on the returning of surpluses,
"...until all legal actions have been resolved on this matter." If this happens
you lost and the lawyers and judges will end up with most of the surpluses and
many years will have transpired.
Remember, he who
writes the rules wins. The people must write the rules here. If the people
allow governments, politicians and those who control our governments to write
the rules, the people will lose again.
|